Why Children Disconnected From Nature Won't Fight to Save It

The argument behind this headline is simple: people protect what they know and love, and children who rarely experience wild places are less likely to grow into adults who defend them. Writers such as George Monbiot and Richard Louv have warned that childhood contact with nature has collapsed in a single generation. One British mother saw the opposite happen when she took her three-year-old son to live on a conservation project in South Africa, and her story shows what close contact with the natural world can spark in a small child.

A toddler in the African bush

The writer, a parent from the English countryside, admits that early motherhood had not matched her dreams of barefoot days in wildflower meadows. Getting through each day was achievement enough. Partly out of a need for adventure, she travelled alone with her son to rural South Africa, where they spent a long stay living in the bush and joining the everyday work of animal conservation.

The effect on the boy was striking. Within weeks, a child who had been wary of dogs on British streets was happily hugging (under supervision) dogs twice his size. He learned to read the time of day from the shadow on a nearby mountain, to spot snake holes in the sand, to tell lion droppings from hyena droppings and to recognise the calls of zebras and baboons. He helped put a blindfold on a sedated buffalo that was being moved to better grazing, fed carrots to semi-tame zebras and perfected his giraffe impression.

He also made a choice of his own. When he realised that the meat on his plate came from animals, he announced that he no longer wanted to eat them, explaining that "animals are there for us to love mummy, not eat." His mother is clear that her story is not a lecture about diet. Her point is that close, personal contact with nature allowed a very young child to form his own views about how to treat it. Back home, he still asks to return to Africa "to see his animals."

How far children have drifted from nature

In a widely shared 2012 Guardian column, George Monbiot described a "second environmental crisis": the removal of children from the natural world. He noted that most people say they want the living planet protected, yet few act, and argued that the young people who might lead its defence now have little to do with it. The figures he gathered are sobering:

Since the 1970s, the area in which children are allowed to roam on their own has shrunk by almost 90%.
In one generation, the share of UK children regularly playing in wild places fell from more than half to fewer than one in ten.
In the United States, the number of children with certain outdoor hobbies fell by half between 1997 and 2003.
British 11- to 15-year-olds were spending, on average, about half their waking hours in front of screens.

Much of this evidence came from Natural Childhood, a 2012 report written for the National Trust by naturalist and broadcaster Stephen Moss, which asked whether every child should have the chance to build a personal bond with the natural world. Earlier, the American writer Richard Louv had popularised the phrase "nature-deficit disorder" in his 2005 book Last Child in the Woods. It is worth knowing that this is Louv's label for a social trend, not a medical diagnosis.

Why children stopped playing outside

Monbiot listed several causes, and most parents will recognise them:

Fear of strangers, which he called largely irrational, given how rare such crimes are.
Fear of traffic, which he called entirely rational: roads really have become more dangerous for children on foot or bicycle.
Loss of common land, the scrubby fields, woods and wasteland where earlier generations played freely.
Indoor entertainment that is more absorbing than ever.
Heavily scheduled childhoods, with every hour filled by lessons, clubs and homework.
Rules against "risky" natural play, from bans on climbing trees to restrictions on dens and treehouses.

Louv makes a similar case, adding that media coverage tends to inflate the dangers of outdoor play while the quieter risks of an indoor childhood go unnoticed.

What time in nature gives children

The benefits go beyond fresh air. In her essay The Ecology of Imagination in Childhood, Edith Cobb studied the biographies of some 300 people regarded as geniuses and found a recurring thread: intense experiences of nature in middle childhood, roughly between the ages of five and twelve. She argued that animals and plants become part of the language of a child's play and imagination.

Studies in several countries have found that children's games tend to be more creative in green spaces than on concrete playgrounds, and that status in natural play depends less on physical dominance and more on inventiveness and language. Psychologist Aric Sigman's 2007 report Agricultural Literacy is among the sources Monbiot cites for the idea that natural settings encourage fantasy, role play, observation and reasoning. Louv links outdoor time with better mood and attention, though research on the size of those effects is still developing.

From love of nature to protecting it

The thread that ties all of this together is attachment. Monbiot argued that without a feel for how the natural world works, gained through early, intense experience, "people will not devote their lives to its protection." That sentence is sometimes credited to Aric Sigman in reposts of this story, but it is Monbiot's own conclusion.

The South African trip illustrates the point in miniature. A boy who had cared for a buffalo and fed zebras now sees animals as individuals worth protecting. Not every family can travel to another continent, and none needs to. The same spark can come from a garden, a park, a beach or a patch of woodland at the end of the road.

Simple ways to reconnect children with nature

Go out in every weather. Waterproofs and wellies turn rain into an adventure. Mud washes off.
Let them lead. Unstructured time poking at puddles, logs and insects often teaches more than a planned activity.
Learn names together. Identifying five local birds or trees makes a familiar walk come alive.
Grow something. A pot of herbs or a bean on a windowsill shows where food comes from.
Try Forest School or outdoor clubs. Many areas run sessions designed to build confidence through outdoor play.
Allow a little risk. Climbing, balancing and exploring within sensible limits build judgement and resilience.
Swap some screen time for green time, and join in yourself. Children copy what adults enjoy.

Whether the planet will be safe in the hands of the next generation may depend less on what children are taught about nature and more on how much of it they get to touch, smell and explore.

Sources: The parent's account was first published by I Heart Intelligence; George Monbiot, "Housebroken" (published in the Guardian as "If children lose contact with nature they won't fight for it", November 2012); Stephen Moss, Natural Childhood, National Trust (2012); Wikipedia: Last Child in the Woods.

Related: