Originally published 2019-04-09.
In 2019 Ariel Desiree McRae, a young woman from the Nashville area of Tennessee, wrote a Facebook post that struck a nerve with hundreds of thousands of people. While she and her fiancé were buying a modest ring set at a Pandora shop, a member of staff remarked that it was "pathetic" for a man to give rings like those as an engagement ring. Ariel kept calm in the store, went home and explained publicly why the price of a ring says nothing about the love behind it. The post was liked more than 100,000 times and shared even more widely. Below is the story, the photos the couple shared, the history behind the expensive-ring expectation, and what research says about how much people really spend.
What happened at the jewellery counter
Ariel and her partner had been together for almost two years. Money was tight for both of them, and by her own account they worked hard just to cover bills and groceries. She says she was not even thinking about a ring; she simply wanted to marry her best friend. He insisted on giving her something anyway, and saved enough for two matching Pandora rings in sterling silver set with cubic zirconia, together costing about $130.
As the sale was going through, a second employee came over to help and commented to the couple that she could not believe some men chose rings like these for an engagement. Ariel described watching her fiancé's face fall. He already felt bad that he could not afford the pear-shaped set she had admired online, and he had asked her more than once whether she was sure she would be happy with the cheaper rings.
Ariel, pictured above, admitted that a younger version of herself would have responded with an angry scene. Instead she replied with one calm sentence, paid for the rings and left.
The rings themselves: two stacked silver bands, one with a small round stone and one with a row of leaf-shaped settings. Cubic zirconia is a lab-made crystal that looks much like diamond and costs a small fraction of the price.
Ariel's answer: love over price
The reply she gave in the shop became the heart of her post: "It isn't the ring that matters; it is the love that goes into buying one that matters."
At home she went further. She wrote that she would have married him with a toy ring from a gumball machine, and she asked when it became normal to believe a man only truly loves a woman if he spends thousands of dollars on jewellery and shows it off. She was careful to say she was not criticising anyone who loves an expensive ring; her complaint was with the idea that possessions are proof of affection.
What hurt most, she said, was seeing how afraid her partner had been that she might love him less because he could not pay more. The couple married at a courthouse, and she described herself as happier than she had ever imagined, with her $130 rings on her finger.
The shop at the centre of the story was a Pandora store. The Danish jewellery brand is best known for charm bracelets and affordable silver pieces, which is part of why a staff member mocking a Pandora purchase struck so many readers as odd.
How the couple met
As the post spread, so many people asked about the couple's story that Ariel added a short version. They met online at 20 and, rather than texting, spent hours on the phone each day. He then drove about an hour to take her on a first date, where she wore a deliberately tacky Christmas jumper. They ate chicken wings, held a burping contest and drove around singing along to the radio. She said she fell for him that night.
They had considered eloping only three months in, but chose to wait until they were more settled. In the end they decided they had waited long enough.
Photos from the couple's story
Ariel with her husband in an early selfie. Photos like this one, rather than the rings, are what most readers responded to: two people who clearly enjoy each other's company.
Another close-up of the ring set, taken in the car. The pearl-like centre stone and the small side stones are typical of Pandora's stacking rings, which are designed to be worn together.
The exchange of rings at the courthouse ceremony. A civil ceremony needs only a licence, an officiant and witnesses, which is one reason many couples on a budget choose it.
The newly married couple share a kiss outside. Ariel later wrote that she had never been happier.
Exchanging vows on the lawn, with the town's historic shopfronts behind them. Ariel's dark floral dress and his white shirt show how simple the day was, and how little that mattered to them.
A portrait from the couple's photo session by Shannon Fulton Photography, against an old log wall. Many couples who save on the ring choose to spend a little on photos, which they keep looking at for decades.
A second shot from the same session, with Ariel showing her ring hand. The warm autumn colours suggest the photos were taken in the cooler months.
The couple pulling silly faces for the camera, a glimpse of the humour that, by Ariel's account, started on their very first date.
The pair together on a rocky coastline. Posts like this, shared after the story went viral, showed readers that the marriage behind the headline was doing just fine.
Where the expensive-ring expectation comes from
Rings as a sign of betrothal go back at least to ancient Rome, where a bride-to-be might receive an iron ring for wear at home and a gold one for public occasions. The first well-documented diamond engagement ring was the one Archduke Maximilian of Austria gave Mary of Burgundy in 1477, and it set a fashion among the European nobility.
The idea that every engagement needs a diamond, and an expensive one, is much more recent. In the late 1930s the diamond company De Beers began a long advertising campaign in the United States, and in 1947 it introduced the slogan "A Diamond Is Forever". De Beers also promoted guidelines on how much a man should spend: about one month's income in the 1930s, later raised to two months in its 1980s advertising. These rules of thumb were marketing, not tradition, yet many people still treat them as etiquette.
What research says about ring spending
A 2007 study in the journal Human Nature by anthropologists Lee Cronk and Bria Dunham of Rutgers University looked at 127 rings that men in the American Midwest had bought with their own money for surprise proposals. Men who earned more spent more, as did men whose fiancées earned more and men who married younger women. The authors argued that ring spending, like bridewealth and dowry in other societies, reflects how both partners are valued in the marriage market. It describes what people do, not what anyone should do.
Later work questions whether big spending is a good sign at all. A 2014 study by economists Andrew Francis-Tan and Hugo Mialon, summarised on Wikipedia, linked engagement rings costing more than about $2,000 with more debt-related stress and a higher chance of divorce. That is a correlation rather than proof of cause, but it is a useful counterweight to the idea that a pricier ring means a stronger marriage. The same summary notes that in one survey nearly a quarter of couples bought no ring at all, and another third spent under $2,000.
What readers shared in response
Thousands of people answered Ariel with their own stories. A selection of comments shared with the post:
One woman recalled receiving a simple ruby, her husband's birthstone, and being teased by a friend with a $5,000 diamond. Nearly three decades later, she wrote, her own marriage was still going strong.
Another reader described a jeweller dismissing her ring as a "promise ring" when she brought it in for cleaning, and how she pushed back. It shows the sales pressure Ariel met is not unusual.
A short comment that captured the mood of the thread: for someone with little money, $130 can be an enormous commitment, and the commitment is what counts.
A lighter reply from a reader who said she would be happy with a $25 ring, or even onion rings. Humour ran through many of the responses.
A reader shared that her former in-laws married very young and wore home-made bands, hammered out of two coins, for the rest of their lives.
A teacher argued that the diamond's status was built by marketing. That is broadly fair: De Beers' campaign began in the late 1930s and its famous slogan dates from 1947. Gem diamonds are less rare than their prices suggest, although high-quality large stones are genuinely scarce.
One woman said her husband made her engagement ring in his woodshop and their wedding bands cost about $45 each, and encouraged couples to spend on experiences instead.
Another found her ring in a pawn shop for $20 and said she wore it with pride, as if it were worth thousands.
A brief reply making the same point many others did: worrying about the price of a ring misses what a marriage is for.
The last comment pushes back on the "three months' salary" rule and suggests that money is better spent on bills or a holiday.
Choosing a ring that fits your life
There is nothing wrong with a beautiful diamond if you can afford it and it matters to you. The lesson of Ariel's story is that the choice belongs to the couple, not to a salesperson or an online audience. A few practical points help:
- Talk about it first. Many people, like Ariel, care far more about the marriage than the stone. Ask rather than guess.
- Set a budget you can pay in cash. Starting married life with jewellery debt adds stress, and the research above suggests it is not a good omen.
- Consider alternatives. Lab-made diamonds, moissanite, cubic zirconia, sapphires, birthstones, vintage or family rings all look lovely and cost less.
- Remember you can upgrade later, or never. Plenty of couples keep their first inexpensive ring for life because of what it represents.
Ariel's rings cost $130. What made her post travel so far was not the price but the man who worried he had not done enough, and the woman who made sure the whole internet knew that he had.
Sources: Story and photos shared by Ariel Desiree McRae on Facebook, as reported by Bored Panda; portrait photos by Shannon Fulton Photography; store photo by Phillip Pessar on Flickr; Cronk and Dunham, Human Nature, 2007; Wikipedia: Engagement ring.
COMMENTS