Stephen Hawking's 1,000-Year Warning for Humanity, Explained

In November 2016 Stephen Hawking told an audience of students that humanity was unlikely to last another thousand years on Earth alone, and that our long-term survival depended on spreading into space. It was a warning, not a calculation: Hawking was arguing that a species confined to one planet is exposed to too many risks, from nuclear war and climate change to engineered disease and artificial intelligence. Within six months he shortened his horizon to about 100 years.

Here is what he actually said, the dangers he had in mind, how scientists view such timelines, and the hopeful message he paired with the warning.

What Hawking said in 2016

Speaking in a lecture reported by The Independent and ScienceAlert in mid-November 2016, Hawking argued that going into space was essential to humanity's future. His key sentence was blunt: "I don't think we will survive another 1,000 years without escaping beyond our fragile planet."

He also acknowledged that self-sustaining colonies on Mars or elsewhere were not realistic for at least another century. That gap, between the dangers we already face and the earliest date we could have a back-up home, is why he said humanity needed to be very careful in the coming decades.

The idea was not new for him. Years earlier he had called it almost inevitable that a nuclear confrontation or an environmental catastrophe would cripple the Earth at some point in the next thousand years, and he had described colonising other worlds as insurance against extinction.

The dangers he had in mind

Hawking never presented a single doomsday scenario. His concern was the combined, accumulating weight of risks that grow with human technological power:

• Nuclear war. Thousands of warheads remain on alert, and a single serious miscalculation could cause damage on a global scale.
• Climate change. Rising temperatures threaten food production, coastlines and ocean life, and add stress to already fragile regions.
• Pandemics. He pointed to the danger of new or engineered diseases, made worse by growing resistance to antibiotics.
• Asteroid impacts. Rare but certain over long enough periods, and one of the few risks humanity cannot cause or stop by behaving better.

His argument was statistical: even a small chance of disaster each year becomes very large over centuries. A population spread across several worlds would not be wiped out by one event on one of them.

Artificial intelligence and autonomous weapons

The same autumn, at the opening of a new research centre on the future of intelligence at the University of Cambridge, Hawking said that powerful AI would be "either the best, or the worst, thing ever to happen to humanity." His worry was not robots turning evil, but machines pursuing goals that do not match ours, with capabilities far beyond our own.

He had already acted on that concern. In January 2015 he signed the Future of Life Institute's open letter on research priorities for safe and beneficial AI. In July 2015 he joined Elon Musk, Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, Noam Chomsky and DeepMind's Demis Hassabis in signing a letter, presented at the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Buenos Aires, that called for a ban on offensive autonomous weapons able to select and attack targets without meaningful human control. More than a thousand AI researchers were among its early signatories, and the total later grew to many thousands.

Around the same time, the founders of OpenAI, then a new non-profit backed by Musk and others, wrote that AI systems were still narrow but that human-level AI could bring huge benefits or serious harm depending on how it was built and used. A decade later, that framing is at the centre of mainstream policy debates about AI safety.

The alien question

Hawking also had a less conventional concern. In his 2016 online film Stephen Hawking's Favorite Places, he said he was more convinced than ever that we are not alone in the universe. But he warned that any civilisation able to reach us would probably be far more advanced, and might regard us about as highly as we regard bacteria.

He had compared first contact to Columbus arriving in the Americas, which did not go well for the people already living there. For that reason he supported listening for signals from other worlds but was cautious about broadcasting our position. Many astronomers think the danger is remote, given the distances involved, but the debate over whether to send deliberate messages into space continues.

From 1,000 years to 100

In May 2017 the BBC announced Stephen Hawking: Expedition New Earth, a documentary in which he argued that humanity had roughly 100 years to begin colonising another planet. As CNBC reported, he cited climate change, overdue asteroid strikes, epidemics and population growth as reasons Earth was becoming more precarious.

The sharp change from 1,000 to 100 years shows that neither figure came from a model. Both were rhetorical deadlines meant to make people take long-term risks seriously. Hawking died in Cambridge on 14 March 2018, aged 76, still campaigning for space exploration.

How seriously should we take the warning?

A common myth is that Hawking "predicted" the end of humanity in a specific year. He did not. He was making the case that one planet is a fragile basket for all our eggs.

Researchers who study existential risk, at centres such as Oxford and Cambridge, broadly share his concerns about nuclear weapons, engineered pandemics and advanced AI, though their estimates of the odds vary widely. Many also point out that Mars is not an easy escape: it has thin air, deadly radiation and no breathable oxygen, and keeping a colony alive without supplies from Earth would be harder than repairing almost any damage we might do here. For that reason, most argue that reducing risks on Earth is the first priority and space settlement a long-term complement, not a replacement.

In practical terms, the warning points to choices people can support today: arms control, cutting emissions, better pandemic preparedness, asteroid detection programmes and careful oversight of powerful AI systems.

Hawking's reasons for hope

For all his warnings, Hawking was not a pessimist. In the same 2016 lecture he called it a glorious time to be alive and doing research in theoretical physics. He then gave students advice that has been quoted ever since: "Remember to look up at the stars and not down at your feet."

He urged them to stay curious, to try to make sense of what they see, and not to give up, because however hard life seems there is always something a person can do and succeed at. Coming from a scientist who lived for more than five decades with motor neurone disease, that encouragement carried real weight, and it is perhaps the most useful part of his message: the long future he worried about depends on what curious, determined people choose to do now.

Sources: Original report by ScienceAlert (November 2016); CNBC, May 2017; Wikipedia, Stephen Hawking; Wikipedia, Open Letter on Artificial Intelligence; Wikipedia, Lethal autonomous weapon.

Related:

• Stephen Hawking Warns About The Greatest Threat to Humanity
• Stephen Hawking and 1,000 Experts Sign Letter Warning Of Weaponized Robots
• These 3 Things Could Destroy The Human Civilization, Says Stephen Hawking
• Stephen Hawking Says We Should Really Be Scared Of Capitalism, Not Robots
• Stephen Hawking's Beautiful Advice For Those Who Suffer From Depression
• Stephen Hawking's Universe - The Story of Everything, Time Travel, Aliens
• Elon Musk Funds $1B Project To Prevent Artificial Intelligence From Destroying Mankind
• Self-Learning Robot Escapes Testing Ground and Goes Missing for 45 Minutes
• Philip K. Dick Android's People Zoo Remark Went Viral