In June 2016 a Russian service robot called Promobot IR77 made headlines around the world after it rolled out of its testing area in the city of Perm. An engineer had left a gate open, the robot moved out into the street, and it travelled about 50 metres before its battery ran down and it stopped, reportedly holding up traffic. Police and company staff walked it back. Days later it reportedly tried to leave again, and its makers said it might be dismantled.
It was a funny story, and it was reported in a breathless way as a machine "escaping". Here is what actually happened, what the robot was built to do, and why some observers suspected a publicity stunt.
What happened in Perm
Promobot is a robotics company based in Perm, a city near the Ural Mountains. On 14 June 2016 the team was testing a version of its robot that was learning to move around on its own. According to co-founder Oleg Kivokurtsev, one of the engineers drove onto the test site and forgot to close the gate behind him, and the robot simply carried on through the opening.
Different reports gave different figures for how long it was out. The earliest accounts said it was missing for about 40 to 45 minutes; later coverage focused on the roughly 50 metres it covered before its power ran out in the middle of a road. A short video posted by the broadcaster RT on Instagram shows the robot standing in the street.
What a Promobot is
Despite the dramatic headlines, the IR77 was not a military or industrial machine. It was a promotional and customer-service robot: a rounded, human-height unit with a screen and a simple face, designed to greet people, answer questions, move through crowds and advertise products in shops, offices and exhibitions.
The model that left the test site was learning automatic navigation, the ability to plan routes and avoid obstacles without a human steering it. Kivokurtsev said those movement functions were intended for the company's next version. In other words, the robot was doing roughly what it had been built to do, moving towards open space, in a place where nobody expected it to find any.
Promobot, whose early development dates back to around 2013, went on to sell service robots that work as receptionists, guides and consultants, and it describes its Perm production site as one of the largest service-robot factories in Europe.
The second "escape" and the threat to dismantle it
About a week later, news outlets reported that the same IR77 had tried to roll away again. Kivokurtsev told reporters the model kept heading for the exit even after its software had been changed. "We have changed the AI system twice, so now I think we might have to dismantle it," he said, adding that other robots of the same make were not behaving this way.
The online reaction was affectionate. Commenters begged the company not to scrap the robot, and some offered to adopt it. The story had turned a piece of equipment into a character.
Was it a publicity stunt?
Many observers suspected so, and the timing helped the suspicion. A company whose product is literally a promotional robot gained worldwide coverage for free, and a second attempt followed just as interest was fading. The company denied staging it.
There is no way to prove either view from public information. What is clear is that the episode was harmless: no one was hurt, the robot was slow and lightweight, and it stopped as soon as its battery did. The more useful question is not whether robots want to escape, which they do not, but how test sites should be secured when autonomous machines are being trained.
Robot stories in 2016, and the myth of the rebellious machine
The IR77 arrived in a year of strange robot and AI headlines. In March 2016 Microsoft launched a Twitter chatbot called Tay that learned from conversations; trolls quickly taught it offensive phrases, and Microsoft took it offline within 16 hours. A few months later Google researchers were reported to be training a language model on thousands of romance novels to make its writing more natural.
These stories are often told as if machines had intentions. They did not. Tay repeated what users fed it. The IR77 followed a navigation routine through a gap nobody had closed. Today's AI and robotics raise real issues, including bias, safety testing, accountability and jobs, but they are human issues of design and oversight rather than robots plotting to break free.
What the episode teaches
- Test in controlled spaces. Autonomous machines should be trialled behind barriers that do not depend on someone remembering to close a gate.
- Plan for failure. The robot stopped safely when its power ran out; good design should make that the default whenever something goes wrong.
- Read robot news calmly. A headline about a robot "escaping" usually describes a machine doing exactly what it was programmed to do in an unexpected situation.
Ten years on, the runaway Promobot is remembered as a light-hearted moment in robotics, and a reminder that the most common cause of a robot misbehaving is still a human mistake.
Sources: Global News (June 2016): Runaway Russian robot may be scrapped; Promobot: About us; Wikipedia: Tay (chatbot); video by RT on Instagram; first reported in English by RT and The Antimedia.
Related:
COMMENTS