Did Ancient Greeks Influence China’s Terracotta Army?

Did ancient Greek artists help shape China's Terracotta Army? The short answer is that it is possible but unproven, and most archaeologists who work on the site doubt it. The idea gained worldwide attention in October 2016, when a documentary by National Geographic and the BBC presented the theory that Greek art, and perhaps even a Greek sculptor, influenced the life-size clay soldiers buried with China's First Emperor more than 2,200 years ago. Headlines went further, calling it "stunning new evidence" that rewrote the history of contact between East and West.

What actually exists is an interesting hypothesis built on stylistic comparisons and indirect clues, set against firm objections from Chinese archaeologists. Here is what the theory says, what supports it, why it is disputed, and what we really know about early contact between China and the West.

The Terracotta Army in brief

The army was discovered by accident on 29 March 1974, when farmers digging a well near Xi'an, in Shaanxi province, struck fragments of clay figures. The group included Yang Zhifa, his brothers and their neighbour Wang Puzhi. Their find turned out to be part of the vast burial complex of Qin Shi Huang, the ruler who unified China in 221 BCE and died in 210 BCE.

Estimates for the three main pits run to more than 8,000 soldiers, about 130 chariots with 520 horses, and 150 cavalry horses. The figures are life-size, usually between 1.75 and 2 metres tall, with officers generally taller. Workshops produced heads, torsos, arms and legs separately and then joined them; faces were pressed from moulds and then given individual features by hand. The figures were originally painted in bright colours, using pigments such as cinnabar, malachite, azurite and the synthetic "Han purple", and archaeologists have recovered more than 40,000 bronze weapon parts, most of them arrowheads. The mausoleum became a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 1987.

What the 2016 theory claimed

The best-known voice behind the idea is Lukas Nickel, an art historian who was then chair of Asian Art History at the University of Vienna. His argument starts from a striking fact: before the First Emperor's tomb, China had no known tradition of life-size human sculpture. Earlier figures were small, often only a few centimetres to around 20 centimetres tall. Then, suddenly, the Qin court produced thousands of realistic, full-size soldiers, along with lifelike acrobats and bronze birds.

Nickel suggested that Chinese artists may have encountered Greek-style statues that spread across Central Asia after the campaigns of Alexander the Great in the late fourth century BCE. He went a step further in interviews: "I imagine that a Greek sculptor may have been at the site to train the locals." He also pointed to Chinese historical records describing large bronze statues cast for the emperor, and to the anatomical detail of some acrobat figures, as signs of new artistic ideas.

Two other strands were added to the story. Li Xiuzhen, a senior archaeologist at the museum on the mausoleum site, was quoted as saying that contact with the West came earlier than once thought and that some sculptures were inspired by Greek art. Separately, studies of mitochondrial DNA from human remains in Xinjiang, in China's far west, were cited as showing that people with European-related ancestry lived in the region around the time of the First Emperor or earlier.

Why many archaeologists disagree

The strongest pushback came from the people who excavate the site. Zhang Weixing, the lead archaeologist at the mausoleum museum, told the AFP news agency there was "no substantial evidence at all" of contact between the Qin tombs and ancient Greece, describing the idea as a scholar's conjecture. The materials, the clay-firing methods and the modular way the figures were assembled all reflect Chinese workshop practice.

Li Xiuzhen herself later said her words had been misrepresented, and that the figures "were uniquely made by the Chinese." Another archaeologist on the project, Duan Qingbo, argued that if one looks for outside parallels, sculpture from Central Asia, such as the statuary of Khalchayan in today's Uzbekistan, offers closer comparisons than anything from Greece itself.

There are also problems with the chain of evidence:

Style is not proof of contact. Realistic sculpture has developed independently in many cultures. Similarities in posture between the soldiers and Greek kouroi are general rather than specific, and the kouros style itself was centuries out of date in the Greek world by the third century BCE.
The DNA shows people, not artists. Ancient DNA from Xinjiang shows mixed populations with western ancestry in the far west of today's China. It does not show Greeks, and it does not connect anyone to the workshops near Xi'an, more than 2,000 kilometres away.
No Greek objects or inscriptions have been found at the tomb. A Greek sculptor training local workers would be expected to leave some trace, such as tools, techniques or motifs, that is clearly foreign. None has been identified.

The idea is not new, either. A German scholar speculated about a link with Greek art as early as 1986, so the 2016 documentary revived an older debate rather than presenting a discovery.

What we do know about early contact

None of this means China and the West were sealed off from each other. Alexander's armies reached Bactria and Sogdiana in Central Asia, and Greek-ruled kingdoms survived there for about two centuries after his death. Their coins and art spread ideas eastward and southward, most famously into the Greco-Buddhist art of Gandhara, in today's Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Goods and ideas could move between such kingdoms and China through chains of intermediaries long before any single traveller made the full journey. The formal opening of the Silk Road is usually linked to the missions of the Han envoy Zhang Qian in the second century BCE, a few decades after the First Emperor's death. Chinese records later describe an embassy claiming to come from the Roman Empire, which they called Daqin, in 166 CE.

That last point also corrects a common claim in coverage of the theory: that Marco Polo, who travelled in the late thirteenth century, was among the first Westerners to reach China. Merchants, envoys and missionaries had made contact long before him, even if his book became the most famous account.

Why the debate is sensitive

The Terracotta Army is a national symbol in China, a monument to the moment when the country was first unified. Suggesting that its creative leap came from foreigners touches a nerve, and Nickel himself acknowledged that sensitivity.

There is also a broader concern among historians. Writing for The Conversation in 2016, Johanna Hanink and Felipe Rojas of Brown University pointed out that Western scholars have a long habit of crediting Greece, or other outsiders, for achievements of non-European cultures. In their view, that habit can obscure the originality of the people who actually did the work. Weighing the theory fairly means keeping both possibilities open: cultures do borrow from each other, and they also invent on their own.

Myths and facts at a glance

Myth: new evidence proved Greeks built the Terracotta Army. Fact: the theory rests on stylistic arguments and indirect clues. Archaeologists at the site reject it, and it remains unproven.

Myth: European DNA was found at the tomb. Fact: the DNA studies concern remains from Xinjiang, in the far west, and do not identify Greeks.

Myth: Marco Polo was the first Westerner to make contact with China. Fact: indirect trade and diplomatic contact are documented more than a thousand years before his journey.

Myth: China had no sculptural tradition before the Qin. Fact: China had a rich tradition of bronze casting and small figurines. What was new was the life-size scale and realism.

Whatever the answer, the clay army remains one of the great achievements of the ancient world, and the open question of where its makers found their inspiration is part of what keeps it fascinating.

Sources: Terracotta Army (Wikipedia); AFP via Hürriyet Daily News: Foreign forces row over China's Terracotta Warriors (28 October 2016); Smithsonian: Did the Greeks help sculpt China's Terra Cotta Warriors? (Jason Daley, 14 October 2016); Johanna Hanink and Felipe Rojas, Why there's so much backlash to the theory that Greek art inspired China's Terracotta Army (The Conversation, via HeritageDaily). Earlier coverage: Pappas Post, based on reporting in The Independent.

Related: