Skopje 2014: The Monument Project, Alexander and the Name Dispute

Facebook ↗WhatsApp ↗
Skopje 2014: Monumental Design and a Disputed Historical Narrative
yeowatzup/Flickr

Skopje 2014 was a government building programme that, between 2010 and the late 2010s, covered the centre of Skopje, the capital of today's North Macedonia, with neoclassical facades, triumphal arches, fountains and well over a hundred statues. Its centrepiece is a giant bronze horseman widely understood to be Alexander the Great. Critics called it nationalist kitsch, a costly attempt to rewrite history and a provocation towards Greece; supporters saw it as a way to give the capital a proud, recognisable identity.

This article explains what was built, how much it cost, why the project became tangled up with the long dispute over the name “Macedonia”, and what changed after the 2018 Prespa Agreement.

What Skopje 2014 was

The programme was officially announced in 2010 by the government of Prime Minister Nikola Gruevski and his party, VMRO-DPMNE. It was first presented as about 20 buildings and some 40 monuments; by the time work stopped, around 136 structures had been built or refaced. Most of them line the Vardar river and the central Macedonia Square: ministries and museums with columns and pediments, bridges lined with bronze figures, a triumphal arch, ornate fountains and even replica galleon-style restaurant boats on the river.

The style surprised many visitors because Skopje's centre had previously been shaped by a very different history. On 26 July 1963 an earthquake destroyed much of the city and killed more than a thousand people. Yugoslavia, with international help, rebuilt Skopje in a bold modernist style, partly to a master plan by the Japanese architect Kenzo Tange. Older articles often describe that concrete architecture as “Stalinist”, but that is not accurate: Yugoslavia broke with Stalin in 1948, and post-quake Skopje is a showcase of late modernism and brutalism. Skopje 2014 wrapped many of those buildings in new classical facades.

Alexander, the name dispute and Greece

To understand why the statues caused such tension, you need the background. When the country declared independence from Yugoslavia in 1991, it chose the name Republic of Macedonia. Greece objected strongly. The largest region of northern Greece is also called Macedonia, home to about 2.4 million people, and the ancient kingdom of Macedon, ruled by Philip II and his son Alexander, lay mostly within the borders of modern Greece. Alexander was born in Pella, in Greek Macedonia, in 356 BC, and the ancient Macedonian kings were part of the Greek world: they spoke Greek, took part in the Olympic Games and spread Greek language and culture across the East.

The modern state, by contrast, is mainly inhabited by Slavic-speaking Macedonians, whose ancestors arrived in the Balkans many centuries after Alexander, along with a large Albanian community. Greece saw the use of the name and of ancient symbols as a claim on its history and possibly its territory. The country joined the UN in 1993 under the provisional name “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” (FYROM), and the dispute later held back its path to NATO and the European Union.

From around 2006 the Gruevski government leaned heavily into “antiquisation”, presenting ancient Macedon as part of the national story. Skopje's airport was named after Alexander the Great, and so was a major highway. Skopje 2014 made that idea visible in bronze and marble, which is why many Greeks, as well as many local critics, saw it as a political statement rather than urban design.

Skopje 2014: Monumental Design and a Disputed Historical Narrative
Dalco26/WikiCommons CC-BY-SA-3.0

Above: the monument to Dimitar Pop Georgiev Berovski, a 19th-century revolutionary, one of dozens of figures from very different periods placed around the centre. Statues of ancient kings, Byzantine emperors, medieval rulers and 19th- and 20th-century revolutionaries in frock coats now stand within a few hundred metres of each other.

The main buildings and monuments

The project's best-known pieces, with the photographs that accompany them:

Skopje 2014: Monumental Design and a Disputed Historical Narrative
The Agency for Electronic Communications and Archaeological Museum (Pudelek/WikiCommon CC BY-SA 4.0)

The Archaeological Museum complex. This long colonnaded building on the riverbank houses the national Archaeological Museum together with state offices. Its rows of columns and its symmetrical facade are typical of the project's “instant antiquity”, built new in the 2010s to look centuries old.

Skopje 2014: Monumental Design and a Disputed Historical Narrative
The Art Bridge. Skopjeinfo.mk/Public Domain

The Art Bridge. A pedestrian bridge over the Vardar, about 83 metres long, lined with 29 sculptures of artists and musicians. It was estimated to cost around 2.5 million euros. A second bridge nearby carries statues of historical figures.

Skopje 2014: Monumental Design and a Disputed Historical Narrative
Warrior on a horse monument by night Diego Delso/WikiCommons CC BY-SA 3.0

Warrior on a Horse. The centrepiece of Macedonia Square was completed on 8 September 2011, the country's independence day. The bronze rider is 14.5 metres tall and stands on a 10-metre column above a fountain that is lit in changing colours at night. The official name avoided naming Alexander, but the figure was universally read as him. It reportedly cost about 7.5 million euros.

Skopje 2014: Monumental Design and a Disputed Historical Narrative
Justinian I monument Dalco26/WikiCommons CC BY-SA 3.0

Justinian I. The Byzantine emperor who built Hagia Sophia was born near present-day Skopje in the 480s, which explains his place here. His statue, carved in white marble in Florence, arrived in the square in June 2011 and cost more than a million euros.

Skopje 2014: Monumental Design and a Disputed Historical Narrative
Horses Fountain Diego Delso/WikiCommons CC BY-SA 3.0

The Horses Fountain. One of several large fountains in the centre, with rearing bronze horses in a classical style. Fountains like this one, often lit at night, were meant to make the square a place to linger and to photograph.

Skopje 2014: Monumental Design and a Disputed Historical Narrative
Triumphal arch "Porta Macedonia" Rašo/WikiCommons CC BY-SA 3.0

Porta Macedonia. A 21-metre triumphal arch with 32 relief panels showing scenes from the region's history, opened in January 2012 at an estimated cost of 4.5 million euros. Arches of this type go back to imperial Rome; this one is a modern statement in an ancient form.

Skopje 2014: Monumental Design and a Disputed Historical Narrative
Close up of Warrior on a horse monument (Juan Antonio F. Segal/Flickr)

The rider up close. Seen from below, the statue's raised sword and rearing horse make clear why it dominates the skyline. Under the later agreement with Greece, plaques were planned for monuments of this kind describing them as honouring the ancient Hellenic period and Greek–North Macedonian friendship.

The cost and the criticism

Official figures were always disputed. Early estimates ranged from about 80 million to more than 500 million euros, and later investigative tallies put the total for all structures above 700 million US dollars. For one of the poorest countries in Europe, with high unemployment, that was a large sum. The opposition Social Democrats argued that many monuments could have been built for a fraction of the price, and architects complained that the money could have paid for useful modern buildings instead of fake old ones.

Critics at home and abroad compared the result to a theme park or to Las Vegas casinos. Some of the materials have aged badly: by 2021 cracks were being reported in several monuments and facades, exposing cheap construction behind the marble look.

The project also became tied to a wider political crisis. In 2015 the opposition released recordings showing that tens of thousands of people, including journalists and politicians, had been illegally wiretapped. Mass protests followed, and in April 2016 demonstrators in the “Colourful Revolution” threw paint at Skopje 2014 landmarks. Older reports linked “dead protesters and police” to this crisis; in fact no protesters were killed, and the deaths sometimes mentioned came from a separate armed clash in the town of Kumanovo in May 2015. Gruevski resigned in January 2016. In 2018 he was sentenced to two years in prison in a corruption case, fled to Hungary and received asylum there; later cases in North Macedonia brought further convictions in his absence.

After the Prespa Agreement

A new government under Zoran Zaev took office in 2017 and moved to settle the dispute with Greece. In early 2018 the airport was renamed Skopje International Airport and the Alexander the Great highway became the “Friendship” highway. The Skopje 2014 programme was halted, and a commission was set up to review its monuments.

On 17 June 2018 the two countries' foreign ministers signed the Prespa Agreement at Psarades, on the Greek shore of Lake Prespa. It came into force on 12 February 2019. The country became the Republic of North Macedonia, for all purposes at home and abroad. Under Article 7, both sides acknowledged that their uses of “Macedonia” refer to different historical contexts: for Greece, its northern region and its Hellenic history and culture; for North Macedonia, its own territory, language and people. The Vergina Sun, an ancient Macedonian symbol found at the royal tombs in Greek Macedonia, was to be removed from public use, and statues such as the Alexander figure were to carry inscriptions placing them in the ancient Greek period.

The deal opened the door to the West. North Macedonia became NATO's 30th member on 27 March 2020, and its EU accession talks formally began in 2022. The agreement remains politically sensitive in both countries.

What Skopje 2014 tells us

For visitors, the centre of Skopje is now an odd but striking place: a modernist city in classical costume. For historians, it is a case study in how governments use architecture to tell a story about who “we” are and who came before us. New columns and bronze kings can borrow the look of antiquity, but they cannot change the historical record, and the record of ancient Macedon belongs to Greek history.

The useful lesson is to read monuments the way you read any source: ask who built them, when, at what cost and for what purpose. In Skopje, the answers are a decade old, not two thousand years.

Sources: Wikipedia: Skopje 2014; Wikipedia: Prespa Agreement; Wikipedia: Nikola Gruevski. Photos credited under each image (Wikimedia Commons and Flickr). Topic first covered by Atlas Obscura.

Related:

COMMENTS

BLOGGER: 2
  1. Hello there! I am from the Republic of Macedonia, which you so kindly call "the nation of FYROM". First of all, that acronym stands for "The Former Republic of Macedonia", an absurd name imposed by the Greek state when my country proclaimed independence form the communist state Yugoslavia. So this fake name was imposed on us in order to become part of the United Nations. Before 1991, the year of our independence, we were part of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, and our then federal state was called Socialist Republic of Macedonia. From 1945 to 1991 Greece had more than enough time to complain about our name, but it didn't. Why is that? Because to Greece, the famous century old so called "Macedonian question" was solved by occupying and dividing Macedonia between Greece, Serbia (later Yugoslavia), Bulgaria and Albania. In all of these surrounding countries there are people who call themselves Macedonians and they identify with us, the citizens of Republic of Macedonia as their fellow countrymen. So what a surprise, Greece wouldn't recognize us as Macedonians, right? That's because in Greece there is a unrecognized Macedonian minority. The Greek government doesn't recognize minorities, according to its policy everybody in Greece is a Greek, therefore Greece brakes basic human rights. Not to mention the atrocities and the exodus imposed to Macedonians that used to live there, that happened after the WW II, and on their properties, in their very own houses actually, they inhabited Greeks from Asia Minor, i.e. from Turkey. They didn't even bother to build them new houses. So what do you call that, huh?

    That is the real problem between Greece and Macedonia, not Alexander the Great. I personally don't give a fuck about Alexander the Great.

    Second, this article is very misleading in it proposes plain lies about my country. For example this part:

    "(It's also worth noting that the controversial antiquation program is not the only scandal, as the country is currently being rocked by a huge surveillance controversy, which has resulted in dead protestors and police.)"

    There is a surveillance controversy in my country now, that's true, and there are protests happening, but during them no protestant nor policeman was killed, this is such a stupid and mal-intentioned shallow mediocre lie!!! There were policemen killed recently, but they were killed while defending our country from criminals and terrorists from the neighboring Kosovo, which happened in Kumanovo. Here is a link:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/macedonia/11595272/Armed-clashes-on-Macedonia-Kosovo-border-reports-of-police-deaths.html

    So that the filthy lying scumbag who wrote this article can inform him/herself a little bit better. And he or she should work on his/her/its English grammar too, but that's another question.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Damjan! The problem is that names of the statues are not Slavic or even better weren't speaking Slavic in their lives, since Slavs weren't there in first place when the Ancient Macedonians existed... actually we are talking about 1000-1200 years difference between the Ancient Macedonians who were speaking ancient Greek and the Slavs who after 1.200 years of their existence decided to call themselves "Macedonians"... To conclude, Macedonians weren't speaking the Slavic language, not even the Slavic language existed by that time... Justinian I (482 - 565 A.D.)? Philip II of Macedon (382–336 BC)?? Saints Cyril and Methodius are closer to the truth.

      Delete