Sapiosexuality: Attraction to Intelligence and What Research Shows

Facebook ↗WhatsApp ↗
0 0 Edit this post
Sapiosexuality: Attraction to Intelligence and What Research Shows

A sapiosexual is someone who finds intelligence the most attractive quality in a partner, often more attractive than looks. The word combines the Latin sapiens ("wise") with "sexual," and it describes what draws a person in rather than which gender they are drawn to. Research suggests that almost everyone values a smart partner, but only a small minority, somewhere between 1 and 8 percent of young adults in one study, fit the stronger description of being aroused mainly by intellect.

Here is where the term came from, what the best available study found, which popular claims about clever people and sex hold up, and what it all means if the label sounds like you.

What sapiosexual means

The idea is simple: for a sapiosexual, a sharp conversation works the way a striking face works for other people. The spark comes from how someone thinks, the questions they ask, the way they explain an idea or push back on yours. A partner who can talk for an hour about a strange book you are reading, or argue a political point well, is more appealing than one who is merely good-looking.

Diana Raab, a writer with a PhD in transpersonal psychology, has described sapiosexuals as people who crave philosophical, political or psychological discussion as part of attraction itself, not as a prelude to it. That captures the core of the idea: the mind is not a bonus on top of chemistry, it is the source of the chemistry.

It is worth being precise about what the term is not. Sapiosexuality is not a sexual orientation in the usual sense. A sapiosexual person can be straight, gay, bisexual or anything else; the label describes a preference about traits, much like someone saying they are drawn to kindness or a sense of humour.

Where the word came from and why it spread

The term circulated in online communities for years before it reached the mainstream. Its big moment came in 2014, when the dating site OkCupid added "sapiosexual" to its list of orientation and identity options. Only about half a percent of users chose it, most often people aged 31 to 40, and women picked it more often than men.

The label drew criticism almost from the start. Detractors called it elitist or pretentious, arguing that it dressed up an ordinary preference as an identity and could be used to look down on people. OkCupid removed the option in February 2019, citing considerable negative feedback. The word itself has stayed in everyday use, especially in dating profiles and social media bios.

What the research actually found

For a long time the only evidence was anecdote. That changed in 2018, when Gilles Gignac of the University of Western Australia and colleagues Joey Darbyshire and Michelle Ooi published the first serious psychometric study of sapiosexuality in the journal Intelligence. They surveyed 383 adults, measured their actual intelligence with four cognitive tests, and built a new questionnaire to capture how strongly people were aroused by intellect.

Several findings stand out:

  • Intelligence matters to most people. Participants ranked "intelligent" second among desirable traits in a partner, behind only kindness.
  • True sapiosexuals are rare. Among 18 to 35-year-olds, the researchers estimated that between 1 and 8 percent could be described as sapiosexual, far from the "way more common than you think" claim that circulated online.
  • There is a sweet spot. Attraction rose with a partner's intelligence up to about the 90th percentile, roughly an IQ of 120, then dipped slightly at the 99th percentile, around 135. Very high intelligence was still rated above average, just not as the peak.
  • Being smart does not make you sapiosexual. People's own measured IQ did not predict whether they identified with the label.
  • Small gender gap. Women reported slightly more attraction to intelligence than men, but the difference was modest.

Gignac admitted he had his doubts that people preferred a very high level of intelligence in a partner. The study also had limits: it excluded people with below-average IQ scores, relied partly on self-report, and could not say whether other traits, like looks or kindness, show the same drop-off at the extremes.

Claims about intelligence and sex that need care

Popular articles on sapiosexuality often bolt on a set of eye-catching statistics. Some are shakier than they sound.

"Smarter people have a higher sex drive"

This idea usually traces back to sales data from the UK retailer Lovehoney, which reported higher interest in its products among students at Russell Group universities. Sales figures from one company are marketing material, not a study of intelligence and libido. They cannot tell us who bought what, why, or whether students elsewhere simply shopped differently.

"Students at elite universities have less sex"

Figures comparing virginity rates at Princeton, Harvard and MIT with national averages were reported in a 2007 article and have been recycled ever since. They came from campus surveys with different methods and age groups, so comparing them directly with national data is unreliable. Even if the gap is real, it may reflect age, workload and study habits as much as any trait of intelligent people. The kinder reading offered in the original post, that clever people are simply pickier, is a guess rather than a finding.

"Intelligent men have healthier sperm"

This one has a real study behind it, but the details are often wrong. The research was led by Rosalind Arden at King's College London, with co-authors including evolutionary psychologist Geoffrey Miller, and published in Intelligence in late 2008. It drew on US Vietnam-era veterans: 425 men provided semen samples alongside intelligence test scores. Higher scores were linked to slightly better sperm count, concentration and motility. The authors stressed that the relationship was small, about as strong as the link between height and intelligence, and that it needed replication. It does not mean a less intelligent man is likely to have poor fertility.

Why intelligence might be attractive

Evolutionary psychologists, Miller among them, have long argued that traits such as language, humour and creativity may have been shaped partly by mate choice, because they were attractive to both sexes. A quick wit or an inventive mind could signal a healthy brain and a capable partner. That remains a hypothesis, debated among researchers, rather than a proven account.

There are more down-to-earth explanations too. Intelligent conversation is engaging, it makes time with someone feel rewarding, and it tends to come packaged with curiosity and the ability to solve everyday problems together. Looks change over the decades; the pleasure of talking with someone can deepen. For many people, that is reason enough.

If the label sounds like you

Valuing a sharp mind is a perfectly reasonable thing to look for. A few points can keep it from becoming a trap:

  • Intelligence comes in many forms. Book learning, emotional insight, practical skill and creativity do not always appear together. Someone who never quotes poetry may still be the most perceptive person in the room.
  • Kindness still ranks first for most people. In Gignac's study it beat intelligence, and long relationships tend to rest on how partners treat each other.
  • Conversation is a skill. If ideas are what attract you, look for curiosity and good listening as much as knowledge. A partner who asks great questions can be more stimulating than one who always has the answer.
  • Avoid the snobbery trap. The criticism of the term is worth taking seriously. Preferring clever company is fine; using a label to rank people is not.

In short, being drawn to intelligence is common, being drawn mainly to intelligence is rare, and the science behind the popular claims is thinner than the internet suggests. The research that does exist paints a fairly warm picture: most of us want a partner who is bright, but we want one who is kind even more.

Sources: PsyPost (2018): Gignac, Darbyshire and Ooi study in Intelligence; Wikipedia: Sapiosexuality (OkCupid option, criticism); King's College London (2008): intelligence and sperm quality study; I Heart Intelligence (original reference).

Related:

Labels:

Facebook ↗WhatsApp ↗

COMMENTS

BLOGGER