This isn’t really like the Super Size Me documentary, where they put some burgers in a container and let them get moldy and rotten, this is merely an illustration of what that tasty cheeseburger goes through in our stomach, though a limited one: an acid demonstration, not a reproduction of human digestion. Why? Because science. Also, because the internet.
Researchers from The University of Nottingham filled a container with hydrochloric acid solution, a chemical found in our stomachs that aids in the digestive process, and dipped a burger in it for 3 and 1/2 hours.
The results were grimy, as the burger turned into a black sludge. Hydrochloric acid breaks down food in the early stages of digestion, so that means one of the first things that McDonald’s cheeseburger does when hitting your stomach is turn into goop. That much is fair, but it is only the start: the stomach mixes food with acid and digestive juices and slowly empties it into the small intestine, where most digestion and the absorption of nutrients take place, so the container’s result should not be treated as an exact account of digestion, and any food, including that kale salad, is meant to end up as a mush. Now, someone try this with a kale salad and get back to us.
Source: True Activist via Minds
Related:
- You’ll Never Eat McDonald’s Again After Reading These 10 Horrifying Facts
- What Happens To Our Body After Drinking Coca Cola?
- Jeremy Paxman Questions Coca-Cola’s James Quincey About Sugar
- A 2013 Coca-Cola Advertisement Recast With Critical Narration
- Nestle CEO: Water Is Not A Human Right, Should Be Privatized
- A List of GMO Free Food Companies
- Food Matters: Questions for Reading a Nutrition Documentary
- Eight Sleeping Positions and the Limits of General Health Claims
- 6 Bad Postures That Are Ruining Your Health & How To Correct Them
- Hydration and Dehydration: Correcting Common Claims About Water
- What Familiar Foods Look Like Before Harvest
- Foods Promoted as Medicines
- 11 Ways to Naturally Boost Your Metabolism for Weight Loss
- 15 Herbs Discussed for Respiratory Health: Evidence and Safety Questions
- 19 Foods and the Limits of Liver-Detox Claims
- 36 Foods and the Difference Between Nutrition and Detox Claims
- FGF1 and Diabetes: What a 2014 Mouse Study Found
- Turmeric and Drug Comparisons: What the Cited Studies Can Establish
- Stamatis Moraitis of Ikaria: A Longevity Story and Its Medical Limits
- Five Foods and Common Liver-Cleansing Claims
- Pomegranate and Artery Research: Animal Findings and Clinical Limits
- Tooth Decay: Early Remineralisation Versus an Established Cavity
Additional source: NIDDK: the digestive system and how it works.
The container leaves out much of the digestive system
An acid bath lacks the full combination of movement, enzymes, changing conditions and onward passage involved in digestion. The appearance of its contents therefore cannot show exactly what a burger does inside a person or establish whether a different food is healthier. The setup is interesting when its limits remain visible.
The stomach is more than a vessel containing acid. Digestion involves muscular mixing, digestive secretions and the movement of food through successive parts of the digestive tract. A container demonstration isolates only part of that environment, which makes it useful for observing a chemical change but limited as a model of a meal inside a person.
To compare foods experimentally, the conditions would need to be comparable: sample size, solution concentration, temperature, exposure time and the way the result is measured. A visually dramatic outcome for one item does not establish how it differs from another item tested under different conditions—or not tested at all.
The appearance of the residue is another separate issue. Darkening or loss of shape does not supply a nutritional analysis, measure absorption or demonstrate a health outcome. A food’s composition and a person’s overall eating pattern cannot be inferred from how unattractive a laboratory mixture looks.
The strongest way to present this clip is to name what was placed in the container and describe the observed change. Anything further should be framed as a question requiring additional evidence. That preserves the demonstration’s curiosity without turning a beaker into a substitute for the digestive system.
COMMENTS