Swedish furniture firm IKEA is making strides to combat its ecological impact by purchasing almost 11,000 acres of protected forest in the US state of Georgia. IKEA, which uses wood in their furniture production, described the Georgia purchase as part of a sustainable forest-management strategy with conservation commitments; that is not a blanket promise that no timber harvesting can occur.
IKEA has purchased the forest from the Conservation Fund, a charity that focuses on protecting and rehabilitating the US wilderness. As part of the deal, IKEA will be handed the responsibility of protecting the land, planting new trees, and protecting the animals that live within the forest. The wider longleaf-pine habitat supports numerous animal species; the frequently cited figure of about 350 should not be treated as a verified inventory of this particular property.
This is not the first time that IKEA has made a large-scale purchase of land. To date, the company owns 613,000 acres of land in the US and Europe, all of which is managed to the highest environmental standards.
IKEA has previously been heavily criticised for its production practices and many have claimed that the production of 'fast-furniture' has a negative environmental impact. 'Fast-furniture' in which furniture tends to be cheaper and is designed to last only for a few years, as oppose to traditional furniture which is normally designed to last for many decades, has been a key factor in IKEA's massive global expansion.
On the other hand, wood and natural products that can be regrown sustainably, are among the most environmentally friendly materials, unlike say plastics, which have a much heavier impact on the global eco-system.
Krister Mattsson, managing director Ingka Investments (the investment arm of Ingka Group, a strategic partner in the IKEA franchise system), said in a statement:
"We are committed to managing our forests sustainably while at the same time meeting our business objectives. In all our properties, we pay special attention to ensuring environmental protection, so we are happy to see that our efforts in working with responsible forest management are being seen and trusted."
Larry Selzer, president and CEO of the Conservation Fund, added:
"We are honoured to work with Ingka Group and applaud its dedication to preserve and enhance forest quality in the US and Europe. Well-managed forests provide essential benefits, including clean water and important wildlife habitat, as well as mitigating climate change."
IKEA has also vowed to lower its carbon emissions and improve on recycling, with the long-term goal of being not just 'carbon-neutral', but 'carbon-negative', by the year 2030. To this end, they are investing $700 million this year alone. (IKEA’s own term is “climate positive”: the aim is to cut more greenhouse-gas emissions by 2030 than the whole IKEA value chain emits. In November 2019 Inter IKEA announced €200 million, about $220 million, for that goal; the $700 million figure could not be confirmed.)
[h/t: Global Citizen]
Protected forest does not always mean no harvesting
A claim that none of the trees would ever be used would be too absolute. Ingka’s announcement described forestland acquired from The Conservation Fund with conservation requirements and sustainable management. A protected working forest can include harvesting under restrictions; it is not necessarily a reserve where every tree remains untouched. Naming Ingka Investments also makes the transaction more precise than treating every part of the IKEA business as one entity. The approximately 10,840-acre figure belongs to this particular 2021 purchase, not to the company’s entire forest estate.
Judge the commitments through their terms
For a forest acquisition, useful evidence includes the conservation restrictions, management plan, habitat protections and monitoring over time. Ownership alone does not establish an environmental benefit, and a public commitment should not automatically be treated as an achieved climate outcome. The article’s animal-species figure also needs its geographic scope: species associated with a wider habitat are not necessarily all documented on one parcel. The purchase is worth examining as a conservation-finance arrangement, with attention to the land’s permitted uses and continuing care rather than a blanket promise that a corporation has permanently stopped every form of timber production there. Ingka Investments’ Georgia forest announcement.
The binding terms that came with the land
The Conservation Fund’s announcement of January 14, 2021 gives the purchase as about 10,840 acres in southeast Georgia, near the Altamaha River basin. Ingka Group took on the Fund’s legally binding agreements for the land, which require protecting it from fragmentation, restoring longleaf-pine forest and safeguarding gopher-tortoise habitat, and the Fund said the public would keep some access. The announcement put Ingka’s forest holdings at roughly 613,000 acres in the United States and Europe, including about 136,000 acres in the US after this purchase. It did not say that timber harvesting was ruled out; the conservation measures sit inside a forest-management plan.Sources: The Conservation Fund: Ingka Investments acquires forestland from the Fund (January 14, 2021)
COMMENTS