Why Materialism Doesn’t Make You Happy: 3 Reasons and the Research

Possessions and Satisfaction: Questions About What You Value

Does buying more things make people happier? Research says: usually not for long. Studies across hundreds of samples find that people who put money, status and possessions at the centre of their lives tend to report lower well-being, and the thrill of a new purchase fades surprisingly quickly. That does not mean owning nice things is wrong. It means that when possessions become the main source of self-worth, they rarely deliver what they promise.

Materialism, in the psychological sense, is not simply liking a good pair of shoes. It describes a set of values and beliefs: that acquiring things is a central life goal, that possessions are a measure of success, and that more of them will bring happiness. Below are three reasons this belief tends to disappoint, what the evidence says, and practical ways to build a healthier relationship with what you own.

Reason 1: possessions promise more than they can give

Advertising rarely sells an object on its own merits. A car is sold as freedom, a watch as success, a sofa as a calm family life. Over time it is easy to absorb the message that the right purchase will make us more confident, attractive or respected.

The trouble is that these are qualities of a life, not features of a product. Once the object is home, it is just an object, and the bigger promise remains unfulfilled. Psychologist Tim Kasser, whose book The High Price of Materialism (2002) brought much of this research together, argues that materialistic goals tend to crowd out the psychological needs that actually support well-being: feeling competent, feeling connected to others and feeling free to choose one’s own path.

A 2014 meta-analysis by Helga Dittmar and colleagues, covering 259 samples and 753 effect sizes, supports this view. It found a consistent negative link between materialism and personal well-being. The associations were modest overall, but they were strongest for negative views of oneself and for risky health and spending behaviour, and the authors suggested that unmet psychological needs help explain the pattern. Because the studies are mostly correlational, they do not prove that materialism alone causes unhappiness; unhappy people may also turn to shopping for comfort.

Reason 2: the glow of new things fades

Every new purchase has a honeymoon period, and then it becomes part of the background. Psychologists call this hedonic adaptation, or the “hedonic treadmill”, a term coined by Philip Brickman and Donald Campbell in 1971. People tend to drift back towards their usual level of happiness after both good and bad changes, so the next purchase is needed to recreate the feeling.

Physical objects also wear out, date and break. Experiences behave differently. In research published in 2003, Leaf Van Boven and Thomas Gilovich asked people to compare a purchase made mainly to have an experience, such as a trip or a concert, with one made mainly to own something. In a national survey of more than 12,000 Americans, most said the experience had made them happier. Laboratory follow-ups found the same pattern.

Several features explain why. Memories of experiences often improve with time, as small annoyances fade and the good parts remain. Experiences become part of our identity and our stories, and they are usually shared with other people. They are also harder to compare directly, so we are less likely to feel that someone else got a better deal. Some later studies suggest the advantage is smaller for people on tight budgets, for whom a durable, useful object can bring real security, which is a fair reminder that context matters.

Reason 3: chasing stuff distracts from what matters

Time and attention are limited. Hours spent browsing, comparing, buying and maintaining things are hours not spent on relationships, health, learning or work that feels meaningful. Money spent on status goods can also mean longer working hours or more debt, both of which are well-known sources of stress.

Materialism also offers instant gratification, while most worthwhile goals require patience. Learning an instrument, building a business, raising children or getting fit all involve slow progress and setbacks. It is tempting to swap that long effort for the quick lift of a purchase, but the satisfaction of meeting a goal you care about tends to last far longer.

How to change your relationship with possessions

Letting go of materialism does not mean giving everything away. A dramatic purge can be just another way of being preoccupied with objects. The aim is a calmer attitude, in which possessions are tools and pleasures rather than measures of your worth.

Separate identity from ownership. Ask what you would still be proud of if you lost your possessions tomorrow. The answer points to what really defines you.

Name what a purchase is for. Before buying, decide whether the item is a practical tool, a source of genuine pleasure, or mainly a signal to other people. All three are human, but the third is the one most likely to disappoint.

Use a waiting period. For non-essential purchases, wait a few days. If you still want it, buy it with a clear conscience.

Shift some spending to experiences and people. Meals with friends, classes, day trips and time outdoors tend to give longer-lasting satisfaction than an equivalent spend on goods.

Practise gratitude for what you have. Noticing and using what you already own can slow the treadmill and reduce the urge to replace.

Give some of it away. Studies of “prosocial spending” suggest that spending money on others can lift mood more than spending the same amount on ourselves.

Common myths about money and happiness

“Money cannot buy happiness.” Not quite. Having enough money to cover needs, avoid debt and handle emergencies clearly improves well-being. The research is about valuing money and possessions above other goals, not about having an adequate income.

“Minimalism is the cure.” Owning fewer things can reduce stress for some people, but there is nothing magical about a bare room. The benefit comes from the change in priorities, not the number of objects.

“Experiences are always better.” Usually, but not always. A reliable bicycle that you ride every day can bring more joy than an expensive holiday you could not afford.

The image above sums up the idea in four words: collect moments, not things. It is a popular saying of unknown origin, and as a rule of thumb it holds up well against the evidence.

Sources: Dittmar et al. (2014), Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: The relationship between materialism and personal well-being; University of Colorado Boulder, 2003: Van Boven research on experiences and possessions; Wikipedia: Hedonic treadmill.

For a design project that gives existing objects a new role, explore Tatiane Freitas Combines Old Furniture With Clear Acrylic.

More from the archive: