Jeanne Calment at 122: What Her Long Life Does and Doesn’t Prove

Jeanne Calment of Arles, France, holds the record for the longest verified human life: she was born on 21 February 1875 and died on 4 August 1997, aged 122 years and 164 days. She smoked after meals until she was 117, liked port wine and ate a lot of chocolate, and she was known for her humour and calm temperament. Her story is often used to argue that a relaxed mind matters more than lifestyle. The evidence tells a more interesting and more careful story: she was an extraordinary exception, and exceptions cannot overturn what we know from millions of other lives.

Who Jeanne Calment was

Calment spent her whole life in Arles, in Provence. Her father Nicolas was a shipbuilder who lived to 93, and her brother François reached 97, so long life ran in the family. In 1896 she married Fernand Calment, a distant cousin and a well-off shopkeeper, which meant she never had to work for a living and could spend her days on tennis, cycling, music and social life.

Her life was not free of grief, though. Her only child, Yvonne, died in 1934; her husband died in 1942; and her grandson Frédéric, whom she had helped raise, was killed in a car accident in 1963. She outlived every close relative. She later told visitors that as a girl she had met Vincent van Gogh in Arles, and her unflattering memory of him became one of her favourite stories.

One more episode made her famous in France. In 1965, at 90, she agreed a life-annuity deal on her apartment with a local notary, André-François Raffray: he would pay her a monthly sum until she died, then take the flat. Raffray died in 1995, two years before her, after paying well over the apartment’s value.

Her habits: chocolate, port, olive oil and cigarettes

Calment’s lifestyle does not read like a longevity manual. Her husband introduced her to cigarettes, and for most of her life she smoked a cigarette or two after meals rather than heavily. She gave up at 117. She drank a little port with meals and could get through up to a kilogram of chocolate a week.

Other details are less often repeated. She ate fruit daily, loved the Provençal beef stew called daube, used olive oil both in cooking and on her skin, and she cycled until she was 100. She lived alone until shortly before her 110th birthday, when a winter accident with frozen pipes led her to move into the Maison du Lac nursing home.

The demographer Jean-Marie Robine, who studied her case, summed up her approach to health in one line: “She never did anything special to stay in good health.” A motto often attributed to her is: “If you can’t do anything about it, don’t worry about it.”

How her age was verified, and the 2018 challenge

Extreme age claims are notoriously unreliable, so Calment’s record was checked carefully. Starting in 1995, Robine and Michel Allard, working with her doctor, compared her memories of people, shops and events in Arles with archives, and traced her through census records from 1876 to 1975. She could answer questions about her youth that only someone who had lived it would know. Their findings were published in 1999.

In 2018, two Russian researchers, Nikolay Zak and Valery Novoselov, argued that Jeanne had died in 1934 and that her daughter Yvonne took her identity. Most gerontologists rejected the idea. French scientists rebutted it in The Journals of Gerontology in 2019, pointing out, among other things, how many people in a small town would have had to be fooled. A DNA test could in principle settle the question, but no sample has been made available, so the record still stands.

Did a calm mind keep her alive?

The viral version of this story claimed that thought is the main factor in health, more important than genes, exercise or diet, and used Calment as the proof. It also contrasted her with a man who ate well, exercised, had a driven “Type A” personality, never laughed, and died of a heart attack at 61.

Stories like these are memorable, but they are a weak basis for conclusions. For every smoker who lives to a great age, there are many more who die decades early, and we simply never hear about them. That pattern is called survivorship bias: the people who beat the odds become famous precisely because they are rare.

Calment also had several advantages that have nothing to do with attitude. She came from a long-lived family, never needed to do hard physical work, had money and security throughout her life, and lived in a place with a mild climate and good food. Her calm nature may well have helped her cope with loss and age, and enjoying life clearly mattered to her. It is impossible to separate those from her genes and circumstances.

The “Type A” idea has its own history. It became popular in the 1950s and 1960s as a possible heart-disease risk, but later research generally found the overall personality type to be a poor predictor; attention shifted to specific features such as chronic hostility, along with smoking, blood pressure and cholesterol.

What research says about emotions, personality and cancer

The original article quoted two papers to suggest that suppressed anger causes cancer. The first was a 1975 study by Greer and Morris in the Journal of Psychosomatic Research, which interviewed women admitted for a breast biopsy. Because the women were assessed around the time of diagnosis, the study could not show whether their emotional style came before the disease or was a reaction to it. The second was a 2000 review in Cancer Nursing that discussed earlier small studies rather than producing new evidence.

Much larger and better-designed research has looked at the question since. A 2014 analysis in the British Journal of Cancer, led by Markus Jokela, pooled six prospective cohorts with 42,843 cancer-free adults in the US, UK and Australia, measured their personality first and then followed them for years. None of the five major personality traits was linked to cancer risk or cancer death, and the authors concluded that “personality is not a risk factor for cancer.”

The US National Cancer Institute takes a similar view of stress. It says studies have given mixed results on whether psychological stress is linked to cancer, that any link may be indirect (stress can push people towards smoking, drinking or overeating), and that evidence that stress directly affects survival is weak.

This is reassuring rather than disappointing. People with cancer sometimes blame themselves for not being positive enough. The research does not support that guilt.

Why one long-lived smoker proves little about smoking

Calment smoked lightly for much of her life, and she still lived to 122. That is remarkable, but it says nothing about the odds for anyone else. In the United States alone, the CDC estimates that cigarette smoking and second-hand smoke cause more than 480,000 deaths a year, close to one in five of all deaths. Smoking remains the leading preventable cause of death in many countries.

Think of it like a lottery winner: the jackpot is real, but buying a ticket is still a poor financial plan. Calment’s genes, light habit and luck gave her an outcome that most smokers will not share.

Practical lessons from a 122-year life

Keep moving. Calment cycled into her 100th year. Regular, enjoyable activity is one of the best-supported habits for healthy ageing.
Enjoy food, in sensible amounts. Fruit, olive oil and home cooking were part of her daily life; so were treats.
Stay connected and keep your sense of humour. Wit and curiosity made her good company to the very end. Good relationships improve quality of life, even if they are not a magic shield against disease.
Don’t copy the cigarettes. If you smoke, stopping helps at any age, and a doctor or local quit service can help.
Look after your mental health for its own sake. Managing stress is worth doing because it makes life better. It does not need to be sold as a cancer cure.

Sources: Wikipedia: Jeanne Calment; Jokela et al., British Journal of Cancer (2014): Personality and cancer risk; National Cancer Institute: Psychological stress and cancer; CDC: Smoking and tobacco use; Greer S, Morris T, Journal of Psychosomatic Research 19(2), 1975; Cancer Nursing 23(5), 2000. The original essay appeared on Collective Evolution.

Related: