John Lennon's Imagine as a Comic by Pablo Stanley

Facebook ↗WhatsApp ↗
John Lennon’s Imagine in Comic Form

Cartoonist Pablo Stanley turned John Lennon’s Imagine into a webcomic in which each line of the song is paired with a drawing of people from very different backgrounds, beliefs and causes, all living side by side. The full-colour comic is shown below, followed by the story of how it was made and the background of the song itself.

Pablo Stanley's Imagine comic


Imagine all the people living life in peace...

Stanley published his comics on his blog, Stanleycolors.com. According to Open Culture, his first take on Imagine appeared in June 2012 as a mostly black-and-white draft. It drew complaints, and he released a revised full-colour version in September 2013 with a note explaining that the comic is not anti-religion or atheist propaganda. A video version set to the song was also made.

Who appears in the comic

Rather than drawing abstract crowds, Stanley filled the panels with recognisable people who held very different beliefs. Open Culture lists among them:

  • Albert Einstein, the physicist, who described himself as agnostic.
  • Martin Luther King Jr., the Baptist minister who led the US civil rights movement.
  • Mahatma Gandhi, the Hindu leader of India’s non-violent independence movement.
  • Bob Marley, the Jamaican musician and Rastafarian.
  • Harvey Milk, the first openly gay man elected to public office in California, who joined the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in 1978 and was assassinated at City Hall that November.
  • Anna Politkovskaya, the Russian journalist whose reporting on the Second Chechen War for Novaya Gazeta exposed abuses; she was shot dead in Moscow on 7 October 2006.

The choice is the point. Putting a Hindu, a Protestant minister, a Rastafarian and an agnostic scientist into the same peaceful scene reads the song’s line about “no religion” as a world where belief no longer divides people, rather than a world without believers.

The story behind the song

Lennon began recording Imagine on 27 May 1971 at his home studio at Tittenhurst Park in England, with strings added in New York that July. It was the title track of his 1971 album and was released as a US single that October, reaching number 3 on the Billboard Hot 100. In Britain it came out as a single only in 1975, and after Lennon’s murder in December 1980 it reached number 1 in January 1981.

The lyrics owe a great deal to Yoko Ono. Her 1964 book Grapefruit, full of short instructions that begin by asking the reader to imagine something, was a direct inspiration, and Lennon himself later said much of the lyric and concept came from her. In 2017 the US National Music Publishers Association formally recognised Ono as a co-writer.

Why Imagine still divides opinion

Lennon was open about the song’s message, which questions religion, nations and possessions. He said it was accepted because it was sugar-coated, and that he had learned to “put your political message across with a little honey”. Critics have called the lyrics naive or contradictory, coming from a wealthy rock star asking listeners to imagine no possessions, and some religious listeners objected from the start.

Even so, it has become one of the world’s most familiar peace songs. Rolling Stone ranked it third in its 2004 list of the greatest songs of all time. Since 2005 it has been played in New York’s Times Square just before midnight on New Year’s Eve, and it has featured in several Olympic ceremonies, from Atlanta 1996 to Tokyo and Beijing.

Why a song works as a comic

A song moves at its own speed; a comic lets you stop on a single panel for as long as you want. That is what makes Stanley’s version effective. Each image gives a face to an idea that, in the song, stays abstract: a peaceful world stops being a slogan once you see Gandhi, Milk and Politkovskaya in the same frame. Whether you agree with every line of Imagine or not, the comic is an invitation to picture the people it describes.

Sources: Pablo Stanley (Facebook); Open Culture, 28 Sept 2015; Imagine (John Lennon song), Wikipedia; Harvey Milk, Wikipedia; Anna Politkovskaya, Wikipedia.

Related:

COMMENTS

BLOGGER: 28
  1. I wish sooo tooo.... maybe someday .... we can't just make a big leap .. it has to be small baby steps :))

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes! God said love all. But religions and countries broke God's commandment and said it is okey to kill those who are against us! Who are these humans behind religions and governments who can veto the supreme creator? And why do we follow them instead of God?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are a moron... John Lennon does not want there to be a following, no religion, no commandments, nothing to divide us of who we are. If you cannot see that than you are one of the issues.

      Delete
    2. And cue the god wad who completely missed the point. This is why Lennon's vision is impossible. They'll never keep it to themselves. They'll never cease the spreading of their poison.

      Delete
    3. christian, communist, nazi, catholic or buddhist etc, same shit different wrapping. Those who cant see that is a part of the problem and the lowest common denominator. Look at yourself and you know who is the problem.

      Delete
  3. This is simply a globalist propaganda

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. No countries and no borders is the most pure anarchist thing you can say, how is that globalist? Internationalist at most but never globalist.
      If it was globalist it would be something like, ONE country, ONE/NO border(s).

      Delete
    3. anarchism is just another way to implement a new dictator.

      Delete
  4. Imagine... wish it would come true.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sounds like the New World Order and people you wouldn't like that

    ReplyDelete
  6. The Message is we should live in peace. That's a nice hope. But even without countries and religions the problems aren't solved.

    And what do we have without countries? Anarchy? A World Government with sub states that can make war?
    And religion? All of the bigger one in the first world live in peace together.

    In my opinion, the real problem is a lack of education and equality. Every person should have enough money to have a good life, the education to understand other positions and prefer giving instead of taking.

    ReplyDelete
  7. If everyone realised that there is no god.... no one to save us.... no heaven to welcome us......and also realised that we are totally on our own in this universe.....then i think that we would naturally look after eachother and the OUR planet...

    ReplyDelete
  8. Promoting New World Order.. what else do i expect from an illuminati puppet..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes. Because everyone who disagrees with you must be in league with some manner of super villainy. It couldn't possibly be that you just hold an indefensible view point of the world that simply doesn't make sense.

      How convenient for your biases to never have to be challenged. It's almost like you'll never have to grow up.

      Delete
  9. This is nice. But people in the West would have to accept a huge drop in their living standards if they really want everyone to be equal and to live in peace. It's easy to support the concept when you're sitting behind a computer in a nice warm house, but the practicalities of actually introducing such a system are mind boggling.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I think anyone who agrees with his comic strip is an idiot (sorry I was trying to find a more polite word but there isn't any).

    He illustrates a picture of Gandhi in support of his views. Gandhi was a religious pluralist. Gandhi didn’t say lets not have religions, instead he wanted all religious belief systems to co-exist in society.

    The problem with today’s society is that we have forgotten how to think for ourselves and we agree with anything if a famous person says something that sounds morally just. Is this man really promoting a world of peace or simply promoting a world where individuals should have no sense of opinion or character?
    Indeed if there was no borders or religions then culture which is embed in those borders or religions will be lost as well.

    Simple answer we need to learn to co-exist with all our “baggage” because the premise of love is accepting that “baggage”.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Re: Idiot - try misinformed, mislead, naive.

      Delete
  11. They all are dead. Someday i'll join to them ;]

    ReplyDelete
  12. no religions, no countries, no rules: caos. wich is the opposite of peace.
    i want a little piece of earth to be mine, everyone need their space and their opinion.
    and saying there is no god is simply stupid.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Marley, Milk, MLK Jr., and Gandhi, as illustrated, might take issue w/ the no-religion/no-god aspect....

    ReplyDelete
  14. A high-standard post with all imperative information about Assignment Help UK services. Looking forward to availing the premium services

    ReplyDelete
  15. For a first-Time reader,this blog has caught my attention.i am definitely gonna try more blogs

    Trinetra is a Coffee table book project on jyotirlinga promoting ,story of jyotirlinga,indian heritage,indian culture,jyotirlinga,hinduism,sadhoowad,name of jyotirlinga,Mallika Empire in whole world

    ReplyDelete
  16. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I am reading your blog and I would like to tell you that the quality of the article is up to the mark it is very well written. Also, I like the layout of your page and the images. Contact us for QuickBooks Error Code 9584 | QuickBooks Desktop Support Phone Number | QuickBooks File Doctor

    ReplyDelete