Twelve labels, twelve one-line roasts: the cards in this collection poke fun at the introvert, the extrovert, the narcissist, the over-thinker and eight other familiar characters. They are not a scientific list of the "most common" personality types, and no study ranks them that way. What psychologists actually measure is a handful of broad traits that everyone has in different amounts. Read the cards for the laugh, then use the notes under each one to see which real trait it exaggerates.
Types or traits: the short answer
Pop quizzes like to sort people into boxes. Research mostly does the opposite. The model with the strongest evidence behind it, usually called the Big Five or five-factor model, describes personality along five continuous scales: openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism (the tendency to feel anxiety and mood swings). Each person lands somewhere on every scale, and most people land near the middle rather than at either end.
That is why a single word such as "romantic" or "rebel" can only ever capture a slice of someone. You can be fairly sociable, quite disorganised, very curious and rarely anxious all at once. A comic card picks one of those slices and blows it up until it is funny. That is the whole joke, and also the reason not to take it as a verdict.
Where personality science came from
Sigmund Freud was one of the first modern thinkers to build a full theory of personality. He argued that adult character grows out of childhood experience and described a series of psychosexual stages; everyday phrases such as "anal" or "anally retentive" for a fussy, controlling person come from that work. Few of his specific claims have held up under testing, but he made personality a serious subject.
The trait approach took a different route. Researchers started from language, on the idea that any important difference between people would end up as a word in the dictionary. Gordon Allport and Henry Odbert listed about 4,500 English adjectives that describe people in 1936. Raymond Cattell boiled them down with statistics in the 1940s. In 1961 Ernest Tupes and Raymond Christal, analysing ratings of US Air Force officers, found five recurring factors, and Warren Norman replicated the pattern in 1963. Lewis Goldberg coined the name "Big Five" in 1981, and Paul Costa and Robert McCrae turned the model into the widely used NEO questionnaires in 1985 and 1992.
So the Big Five was not a single discovery by two teams in one decade, as older versions of this story claimed. It was a slow convergence of several research groups over roughly thirty years.
The twelve cards, and the real trait behind each joke
The illustrations were created by the Indian site ScoopWhoop for a series it called "Honest Personality Descriptions". The humour is deliberately rude, so expect a little crude language.
Introvert. The card claims introverts are duller than rocks and compares them to a Game of Thrones character. In research terms, introversion simply means scoring low on extraversion: preferring quieter settings and recharging alone. It is a preference, not shyness, which comes from social anxiety, and Carl Jung, who popularised the term, never treated it as a flaw.
Extrovert. Here the joke is volume: the extrovert is the reason colleagues reach for headphones. High extraversion does go with talkativeness, energy and assertiveness, and extraverts on average report more positive emotions. The card ignores the middle ground, where most people actually sit; psychologists call them ambiverts.
Narcissist. The card mocks someone who believes even traffic lights are admiring them. Everyday vanity is common and sits on a spectrum. Narcissistic personality disorder is something different: a clinical diagnosis that only a qualified professional can make, so it is worth keeping the label for jokes and the diagnosis for doctors.
Pessimist. This character would greet the Moon landing with a shrug. Persistent gloom overlaps with high neuroticism in the Big Five, the trait linked to worry and low mood. A mild habit of expecting problems can be useful for planning; when low mood lasts weeks and affects daily life, talk to a doctor.
Optimist. The optimist sees a light at the end of the tunnel even when it is an oncoming train. That is a neat summary of what psychologists call optimism bias, the tendency to underestimate our own chances of bad outcomes. Hope helps motivation; the trick is pairing it with a realistic plan.
Realist. The realist is described as the "no filter" option of Instagram: accurate but unimaginative. No Big Five scale is called realism, but the description hints at lower openness to experience, which goes with a practical, concrete style of thinking. Low openness is not low intelligence; it often means preferring the tried and tested.
Creative. The card teases people who say they are too creative for ordinary jobs and suggests they simply avoided maths. Creativity is most closely tied to high openness, and it shows up in science and engineering as much as in art. Plenty of mathematicians score high on openness too.
Romantic. The romantic expects every date to turn into Mr Darcy from Pride and Prejudice or Rose from Titanic. Warmth and trust map loosely onto agreeableness, and idealised expectations are a familiar theme in relationship research. Fiction makes a nice template for feelings and a poor one for schedules and bills.
Nerd. The nerd wears the T-shirt, recites trivia and gets a cheeky line about their love life. Intellectual curiosity is one facet of openness. "Nerd" itself has drifted from insult towards badge of honour as science, gaming and fandom went mainstream.
Rebel. The rebel parks exactly where the sign says not to. Rule-bending is associated with low conscientiousness and, sometimes, low agreeableness. Conscientiousness is the Big Five trait most consistently linked to job performance and longer life, so the rebel's parking tickets have a statistical echo.
Chiller. The chiller turns up to work in sweatpants, if they turn up at all. Being relaxed and hard to rattle matches low neuroticism, which is a genuine asset under pressure. The card's real target is low conscientiousness, a separate trait: calm and organised can live in the same person.
Over-thinker. The last card describes someone in a corner seat, convinced everyone is reading their screen. Rumination and the feeling of being watched both link to higher neuroticism; psychologists also describe a "spotlight effect", our habit of overestimating how much others notice us. Most people on the train are thinking about themselves.
Why descriptions like these feel so accurate
In 1948 the psychologist Bertram Forer gave his students a "personal" profile after a test. Every student received the same text, lifted from an astrology book, and on average they rated it 4.3 out of 5 for accuracy. Paul Meehl later named this the Barnum effect, after the showman P. T. Barnum. Short, vivid descriptions invite us to fill in the gaps with our own memories, so almost anyone can recognise a bit of themselves in several of these cards at once.
The same caution applies to popular type tests. The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, built on Jung's ideas by Katharine Cook Briggs and Isabel Briggs Myers, sorts people into sixteen four-letter types. Studies have found that a large share of people get a different type when they retake it a few weeks later, partly because most scores cluster around the cut-off points. Costa and McCrae showed in 1989 that its scales largely track four of the Big Five traits, which suggests the dimensions are real while the boxes are not.
What research says about traits that matters in real life
- Traits are fairly stable but not fixed. They are recognisable from childhood into adulthood, yet most people become somewhat more conscientious and agreeable, and less neurotic, as they age.
- Genes and environment both count. Twin studies put the heritability of each trait at roughly 40 to 60 percent, leaving plenty of room for experience.
- Culture shapes the picture. The five-factor structure replicates in dozens of countries, but a 2013 study of the Tsimane people of Bolivia found only two broad clusters, a reminder that the model is not universal.
- Behaviour can stretch. Introverts can act outgoing when a situation calls for it; they may simply find it more tiring afterwards.
How to use a personality label without being trapped by it
Treat a type as a conversation starter, not a diagnosis. If a card stings, ask which trait it is pointing at and whether that trait helps or hurts you in a particular setting. A low-key person may need to schedule recovery time after big events; a spontaneous one may need a reminder system for deadlines. For a more reliable picture than a meme, look for questionnaires based on the Big Five, and remember that how you behave on a given day still depends on sleep, stress and the people around you.
Explore more: A Four-Personality Quiz, and What Research Says About Personality Types.
Sources: Illustrations by ScoopWhoop, "Honest Personality Descriptions"; earlier write-up at Awareness Act; Wikipedia: Big Five personality traits; American Psychological Association, Monitor on Psychology (March 2013): the Tsimane study; Wikipedia: Barnum effect; Wikipedia: Myers–Briggs Type Indicator; Wikipedia: Extraversion and introversion.
asdasd
ReplyDelete