Gunduz Aghayev's War and Peace: Satirical Illustrations of War

Powerful Satirical Illustrations Show What War Really Looks Like

Azerbaijani cartoonist Gunduz Aghayev (also spelled Agayev) is known for sharp digital illustrations that turn the news into visual satire. In late 2015 he finished a series called War and Peace, a set of images that strip the glamour from modern conflict and point instead at the people who profit from it, the civilians caught in the middle and the habits of mind that keep wars going.

The series opens well with a line from Voltaire. In his Questions sur l’Encyclopédie (1771) the French writer observed: “It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets.” Aghayev’s drawings work in the same spirit. They do not lecture; they put two familiar things side by side, such as a family welcome and a severed body, or a summit photo and a pile of corpses, and let the contrast do the talking.

Aghayev works on a graphics tablet, which lets him respond to events quickly, and his cartoons have appeared in publications in several countries. He has said in interviews that drawing is how he takes a stand, and that he chose “the side of justice” rather than any party. Below are the nine images shared from the series, each with a short reading of what it shows.

Who is Gunduz Aghayev?

Aghayev grew up in Bilasuvar, in southern Azerbaijan, the son of an artist, and studied painting before turning to political cartoons. He first drew wide international attention with satirical series such as Holy Selfies and Femidead, and later left Azerbaijan, saying his work had brought him pressure. In a 2016 interview he described himself as a political individualist for whom human dignity and freedom of speech come first.

His style is clean and almost cheerful: bright colours, clear outlines and familiar settings like suburban houses, shopping streets or summit stages. That cheerfulness is the trap. The eye relaxes, and then it finds the detail that changes the meaning of the whole picture.

The cost of war, brought home

The image at the top of this page is a twist on the famous “March of Progress” diagram, in which human evolution is drawn as a line of figures walking upright. Here the line runs from a crouching early human through a Roman legionary, a Renaissance soldier and a Napoleonic infantryman to a modern rifleman, and it ends at a mushroom cloud, with a figure reduced to its starting crouch. The message is that our weapons evolved faster than our wisdom.

A smiling mother and child welcome a soldier home, waving in front of a tidy house. They are hugging only his legs; the rest of him, upper body still in combat gear, stands apart against a sky of oil pumps. The trail of blood across the driveway turns a homecoming scene into a question about what soldiers bring back and what they were sent to secure.

A child stands in the doorway of a mud-brick house while armed men crouch on both sides of the wall, one in Western combat gear, one in local dress with a rifle. Neither fighter can see the other, but both are aimed at the same spot. Civilians, and especially children, are the people most often caught between front lines in modern wars.

Leaders, brands and extremism

World leaders pose in neat rows in front of their national flags, just as they do in the official photo of every G20 summit. At their feet lies a heap of bodies. Aghayev is not accusing any single government; he is pointing at the gap between the polished diplomacy of international meetings and the human toll of the decisions taken there.

A masked gunman in an explosives vest stands at the corner of a fast-food restaurant, holding up the severed head of a clown mascot, while children run happily towards the entrance. The image mixes two kinds of fear that dominate modern headlines, terrorism and the threat to ordinary public places, with a jab at global brands as symbols of the West. It is deliberately uncomfortable, and it is meant to be.

A bustling city street, full of billboards, shoppers and taxis, sits on top of a trench where soldiers crawl through mud. The picture can be read two ways: life in rich cities goes on as if distant wars do not exist, or the comfort above depends on the fighting below. Either reading asks the viewer to notice what is happening out of sight.

Hope, and a dark Christmas

Children push a dumpster stamped “WAR” and overflowing with rifles, missiles and grenade launchers towards the edge of a cliff. It is the most hopeful image in the series, and it gives the job to the generation that has not yet learned to accept war as normal. The bright dawn sky behind them underlines the point.

This one is a parody of Vera Mukhina’s 1937 sculpture Worker and Kolkhoz Woman, made for the Soviet pavilion at the Paris World’s Fair, in which two figures raise a hammer and a sickle together. Aghayev replaces them with a neo-Nazi wearing a swastika armband and a masked jihadist raising a hammer and a curved sword. The swastika here is satire, not endorsement: the image suggests that extremist movements that claim to hate each other share the same appetite for violence.

A soldier in a Santa hat stands in the snow with a rocket launcher on his shoulder, beside a mortar decorated with Christmas baubles. Overhead, Santa’s sleigh crosses the night sky, unaware it has become a target. The drawing mocks the habit of dressing war up in festive or patriotic packaging, and it stands in sharp contrast to the real Christmas truce of 1914, when roughly 100,000 British and German soldiers stopped fighting along parts of the Western Front.

How satire talks about war

Anti-war art has a long history, from Goya’s etchings of the Peninsular War to the cartoons of the twentieth century. Satire works differently from documentary photography. A photo shows one real event; a satirical drawing compresses a whole argument into a single scene, often by joining two things that are usually kept apart, like a family photo and a battlefield.

That approach has limits. Satire simplifies, and some viewers will find images like the fast-food scene or the pile of bodies too blunt. But it also reaches people who would never read a report on arms sales or civilian casualties, and it tends to stay in memory. Aghayev’s series does both: it is easy to look at, and hard to forget.

Questions worth asking

The series is best used as a starting point for discussion, at home or in a classroom. A few questions it raises:

Who benefits financially when wars begin, and who pays the cost?
Why do civilians, especially children, so often make up a large share of the victims?
How do news images, holidays and national ceremonies shape the way we feel about conflict?
What would it take for a society to treat war as a last resort rather than a normal tool of policy?

Voltaire’s line is more than 250 years old. That it still fits so neatly over a set of twenty-first-century cartoons is the strongest argument the series makes.

You can follow more of Aghayev’s work on his Facebook page and Instagram account.

Sources: Illustrations by Gunduz Aghayev (image credit: Gunduz Aghayev/Facebook); Meydan TV: Gunduz Agayev, “I chose the side of justice” (December 2015); Meydan TV interview (September 2016); Wikiquote: Voltaire; Wikipedia: Worker and Kolkhoz Woman; Wikipedia: Christmas truce; originally shared via The Mind Unleashed.

Related: