Originally published 2021-06-07.
Kory Yeshua is the father behind a short TikTok clip from June 2021 in which he and his young daughter, Royalty, repeat a simple message about race: a child's worth has nothing to do with the colour of their skin. The video spread quickly, landed Yeshua an interview on Fox News's "Fox & Friends", and became a talking point in the heated American argument over how schools should teach race and history.
His core message, in his own words on the show, was that he wanted little White kids to know they are not oppressors
, and Black children to know they are not oppressed. Below we explain what the clip said, what prompted it, why it struck a nerve in 2021, and what parents can take from it, whatever their politics.
What the father-daughter video said
The clip is built like a lesson at home. Yeshua, who is African American, speaks a line and his daughter answers, the way many parents rehearse manners or times tables with small children. The theme is self-worth: nobody is born guilty, nobody is born a victim, and a person can reach any goal they work for.
He closed his explanation on air with a sentence that became the clip's headline: your skin color does not matter
. For many viewers that was a warm, almost old-fashioned message. For others it sounded like a rebuttal to anti-racism lessons that ask children to notice inequality. That split is exactly why the video travelled so far.
(The video originally embedded here is no longer available on YouTube.)
The original YouTube upload that accompanied this story has since been removed, but the interview and the TikTok clip were widely described in news coverage at the time.
The question that started it
According to Fox News, the video grew out of an ordinary parenting moment. Royalty had watched a clip about segregation in the American South, which showed a drinking fountain labelled for white people only. Afterwards she asked her father why a white child and a Black child in the film were not allowed to play together.
Yeshua said he had not planned to explain Jim Crow laws to her so young, but the question forced the conversation. He chose to answer by stressing character over colour, and then decided to share that approach publicly. He also told Fox News that his family had been touched by hardship, with one brother in prison, another lost to an overdose and a third murdered, and that this pushed him to speak out about the values he wanted to pass on.
Before this clip, Yeshua had already built a following on TikTok with videos criticising Democratic Party policies, so his audience was partly political from the start.
An echo of Martin Luther King Jr.
The language Yeshua uses about character is a deliberate echo of the most quoted line in American civil-rights history. On 28 August 1963, speaking from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial to a crowd of more than 250,000 people at the March on Washington, Martin Luther King Jr. said he dreamed his four children would one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.
That sentence is claimed by people on both sides of today's debate. Some read it as a call for colour-blindness: treat everyone the same and stop sorting people by race. Others point out that the same speech spent most of its length describing concrete injustices, such as segregation and voting barriers, and argue that King wanted those named and fixed, not ignored. Understanding both readings helps explain why one family video could be praised and criticised at the same time.
Why it landed in the critical race theory fight
Fox News framed the clip as a message against critical race theory, usually shortened to CRT. In its academic sense, CRT is a framework that grew out of American law schools from the mid-1970s, through scholars such as Derrick Bell and Kimberlé Crenshaw. It argues that racism is not only a matter of individual prejudice but can be built into laws, rules and institutions, producing unequal results even when the rules look neutral. The name itself was coined at a 1989 workshop.
From 2020 onward, the term moved far beyond legal scholarship. Conservative politicians, activists such as Christopher Rufo and several Fox News hosts used it as a label for a broad range of school diversity programmes and lessons on racism. Supporters of those lessons replied that critics were misdescribing CRT, which is rarely taught as such to young children, and were trying to limit honest teaching about history. Dozens of US states introduced bills restricting how race could be discussed in classrooms, and a 2024 study counted 16 states that had enacted such policies.
Yeshua's clip arrived at the peak of that argument. Because he is a Black father, his words were shared widely by opponents of CRT as proof that their position was not about race. Critics countered that a single family's view, however sincere, does not settle questions about policy or history.
Common misunderstandings about the debate
- "The video is about a school curriculum." It is not. It shows how one parent talks with his own child. It does not describe what any school was teaching.
- "Teaching about racism means calling children oppressors." Some lessons have been criticised for framing identity this way, but many history lessons on segregation simply describe what happened. The two should not be confused.
- "Colour-blind values and historical honesty are opposites." Plenty of families combine both: they tell children their worth does not depend on race, and they also explain that laws once treated people unfairly because of it.
- "King's line belongs to one political side." It has been quoted by liberals and conservatives alike, often for opposite purposes. Reading the full speech is the best guard against selective use.
Talking with young children about race and history
Whatever you think of the politics, the moment Yeshua describes is one many parents face: a child sees something about the past and asks a hard question. A few principles help regardless of viewpoint.
- Answer the question that was asked. Young children usually want a short, honest reply, not a lecture. "Some laws used to keep people apart because of their skin colour, and those laws were wrong" is a complete first answer.
- Pair hard facts with agency. Children cope better with difficult history when they also hear how people resisted it and changed it, from bus boycotts to court cases.
- Keep the door open. Let them know they can come back with more questions. Understanding grows over years, not in one talk.
- Model the values you describe. Children notice how adults treat neighbours, classmates and strangers far more than what adults say about fairness.
Yeshua's video resonated because it captured that ordinary parental instinct: to protect a child's confidence while explaining an unfair world. Viewers can agree with his framing, disagree with it, or land somewhere in between, and still recognise the care behind it.
Sources: Fox News, 3 June 2021 (original interview); Wikipedia: I Have a Dream; Wikipedia: Critical race theory.
COMMENTS